OBAMA TRIED TO STALL GI's IRAQ WITHDRAWAL...

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09152008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obama_tried_to_stall_gis_iraq_withdrawal_1

It Depends What the Definition of "Win" Is...

July 3rd, 2008. On the news last night, I believe CNN,there was an Obama surrogate talking about BHO's flip flop on the war...about his campaign promise to be out of Iraq in 16 months. Obama made his statement, then had another new conference and 'c-l-a-r-i-f-i-e-d his statement to be that when elected Command in Chief, he will remove 'combat troops' (please read carefully) from Iraq...but what troops will be leave behind? What will the cost be of those 'left behind'?

This guy actually said, and I quote, "It depends on what the definition of "Win" is!" I am not kidding....now who does that sound like? Remember the famous "it depends on what the definition of 'IS' is"...our illustrious impeached president, William Jefferson Clinton! I could not believe my ears...

Deja Vu, all over again.

SENATOR OBAMA'S FANTASY PLAN FOR MAKING US SAFER...

For Immediate Release
Contact: Press Office

Wednesday, March 19, 2008
703-650-5550

ARLINGTON, VA -- U.S. Senator John McCain's presidential campaign today released the following statement by Senior Advisor Mark Salter on Senator Barack Obama's Iraq speech today:

"Senator Obama says that ending the war will not be easy, that 'there will be dangers involved.' Yet, in that patented way of his, he declines to name those dangers. Let me enumerate a few: al Qaeda, which is now on the run, will survive, claim victory and continue to provoke sectarian tensions that, while they have been subdued by the 'tactics' of the surge, still exist and are ripe for provocation by al Qaeda, which would almost certainly ignite again civil war in Iraq, a civil war that could easily descend into genocide. To say that invading Iraq was used as a recruiting tool for al Qaeda is one thing. To pretend that our defeat there won't provide an even bigger one is foolish supposition. Iran, which trains Shia extremists and is known to arm and equip Sunni extremists, a fact Senator Obama is apparently unaware of, will also view our premature withdrawal as a victory, as will other countries in the region, and the biggest state supporter of terrorists, a country with nuclear ambitions and a stated desire to destroy the State of Israel, will see its influence in the Middle East grow significantly. These are some of 'dangers,' that our premature withdrawal from Iraq will engender, and they all have the potential to destabilize the entire region. A realistic plan to prevent them from occurring is what people with experience in statecraft call 'strategy,' something Senator Obama has not offered yet.

"Senator Obama, as has also become a habit of his 'new politics,' mischaracterizes John McCain's position by saying McCain did not want to reduce troops because the violence in Iraq was too high, and now do not wish to do so because the violence in down. The reason violence is down is because General Petraeus' counterinsurgency is, which even Senator Obama recognizes, succeeding. Those 'tactics,' are advancing our 'strategy.' Deprive General Petraeus of the resources and manpower to employ those tactics, or worse, leave Iraq altogether, and our strategy will collapse. That is national security 101. John McCain wants American forces to come home when our clear and serious interests at stake in Iraq, which nearly 4,000 Americans have given their lives to secure, are truly safe, when al Qaeda is defeated; Iran's influence is contained, and the potential for a truly cataclysmic civil war in Iraq is remote. That, I think, is what is called 'making us safer.' Senator Obama's plan, if it can be charitably described as one, would do the reverse."