Thursday, October 30, 2008
Do You Stop a Fireman Just Before He Saves a Child?
Watch this video from an Iraq vet...watch it to the end...
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Workers Unite...It's Time for Revolution!
Obama Campaign Calls on Americans to Not Wor
k on Election Day. This is becoming a recurring theme of the Obama campaign. Brown Shirts. Workers Unite. Demonstrations. Protest election day.
k on Election Day. This is becoming a recurring theme of the Obama campaign. Brown Shirts. Workers Unite. Demonstrations. Protest election day. Disenfranchisement. Voter fraud. Intimidation. News blackouts. Brown Shirts. Propoganda. Workers unite.
Make Calls...Knock on doors...intimidate voters....it's on Obama's website, comrades. Bone chilling. Follow the money.
BHO wants nothing less than total disruption of our country, and is willing to become elected at any cost. The cost of idle factories, idle business, idle students, and idle waitresses is a small price to pay for his version of CHANGE.
Just think what this country will be like if he does not get his way....every issue becomes a mass demonstration. Workers strike. Flare ups. Unrest. Increased union control. Incivility. All for what? Socialism...
Make Calls...Knock on doors...intimidate voters....it's on Obama's website, comrades. Bone chilling. Follow the money.
BHO wants nothing less than total disruption of our country, and is willing to become elected at any cost. The cost of idle factories, idle business, idle students, and idle waitresses is a small price to pay for his version of CHANGE.
Just think what this country will be like if he does not get his way....every issue becomes a mass demonstration. Workers strike. Flare ups. Unrest. Increased union control. Incivility. All for what? Socialism...
so⋅cial⋅ism
[soh-shuh-liz-uhm]
1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3. (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
[soh-shuh-liz-uhm]
1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3. (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
Monday, October 27, 2008
A Creative Approach to the Redistribution of Wealth...
>>>FROM THE NET...
Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." The guy had more guts than a gut factory sitting there showing his support. Later, I sat down in the restaurant and my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I smiled as he had given away his political preference--I wanted to get up and leave, but a flash of insight hit me.
I stayed. I could not believe it. I am amongst them....of all things, just imagine the coincidence. When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I would not tip him because I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept.
He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily cussed me out as a cheap old S.O.B., and stormed from my sight along the way telling the others servers that he just got stiffed by the gray-haired wrinkled old S.O.B. I just smiled and held my Irish Temper.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy a $7.00 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful. At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty damm angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more. I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.
Is the redistribution of someone else's wealth a great idea, or just a fools game!!
Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." The guy had more guts than a gut factory sitting there showing his support. Later, I sat down in the restaurant and my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I smiled as he had given away his political preference--I wanted to get up and leave, but a flash of insight hit me.
I stayed. I could not believe it. I am amongst them....of all things, just imagine the coincidence. When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I would not tip him because I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept.
He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily cussed me out as a cheap old S.O.B., and stormed from my sight along the way telling the others servers that he just got stiffed by the gray-haired wrinkled old S.O.B. I just smiled and held my Irish Temper.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy a $7.00 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful. At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty damm angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more. I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.
Is the redistribution of someone else's wealth a great idea, or just a fools game!!
Friday, October 24, 2008
Hide Your Candy, a Democrat!
share/spread... its all the same... We earners *have* to give to non earners... Which is the change Obama has been talking about all these months... Little did we know that Obama's change is actually success. And, it will not longer be tolerated because it will be taxed to death... Gentleman, especially you small business people, hang on to your wallets, its going to be along 4 years...
>Thanks SteveD!
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Study Shows McCain Media Coverage Mostly Negative...
The Project for Excellence in Journalism's report shows John McCain's media coverage has been 57 percent negative, while Barack Obama's has been 29 percent negative.
Full article here: http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/22/study-shows-mccain-media-coverage-negative/
Full article here: http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/22/study-shows-mccain-media-coverage-negative/
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
AP presidential poll: All even in the homestretch...
Oct 22 01:23 PM US/Eastern
By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - The presidential race tightened after the final debate, with John McCain gaining among whites and people earning less than $50,000, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll that shows McCain and Barack Obama essentially running even among likely voters in the election homestretch.
The poll, which found Obama at 44 percent and McCain at 43 percent, supports what some Republicans and Democrats privately have said in recent days: that the race narrowed after the third debate as GOP-leaning voters drifted home to their party and McCain's "Joe the plumber" analogy struck a chord.
Three weeks ago, an AP-GfK survey found that Obama had surged to a seven-point lead over McCain, lifted by voters who thought the Democrat was better suited to lead the nation through its sudden economic crisis.
The contest is still volatile, and the split among voters is apparent less than two weeks before Election Day.
"I trust McCain more, and I do feel that he has more experience in Government than Obama. I don't think Obama has been around long enough," said Angela Decker, 44, of La Porte, Ind.
>>>I was right there today at the event. I am the handsome guy with the "M" painted on, to spell "M-A-V-E-R-I-C-K," or did I take this pic?
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Krystallnacht...Brown Shirts Control Prince George's County...
Funny. I guess not so funny when you really think about it. An independent business puts up a McCAIN-PALIN sign, and the Obama Brown Shirts swing into action. Forgeddabout good debate. Forgeddabout healthy competion. Forgeddabout neighbor living peaceably next to neighbor. The Obama campaign supporters, the DemocraPs, and bullies have intimidated the business to take the sign down. 77% Democrat, and Joe the Hotelier can't put up an M-P sign. Even the NAACP was outraged?!?!?!
Shameful. Should be fun if 'they' get in the White House. Union control, centralized thought, and Brown Shirts intimidating businesses...Krystallnacht. It's no joke. Neighbor turning on neighbor.
Do your homework. Study history. It repeats itself, you know.
Read the Washington Post story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/11/AR2008101101465_pf.html
Shameful. Should be fun if 'they' get in the White House. Union control, centralized thought, and Brown Shirts intimidating businesses...Krystallnacht. It's no joke. Neighbor turning on neighbor.
Do your homework. Study history. It repeats itself, you know.
Read the Washington Post story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/11/AR2008101101465_pf.html
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
McCain's Med Plan Offers Consumers More Long-Term Choice...
By Editorial, Rocky Mountain News October 13, 2008
Article Excerpt: Click here to read entire post.
If there's one issue Coloradans have been intently listening to in the season of never-ending political debates - besides the economy, of course - it's probably health care. A new Census Bureau report, after all, reveals that nearly one in five Coloradans under age 65 lack health insurance. The number jumps to 35 percent when only counting the Hispanic community. And while that doesn't mean every one of those residents is in financial straits because of health care costs, one catastrophic medical crisis can send a family to the poorhouse. Both political parties and their candidates are quick to agree that America's health care system is fractured. Both John McCain and Barack Obama are touting preventive care and better information technology to cut costs, and have proposed safety nets (though markedly different) to cover the hard-to-insure, such as patients with pre-existing conditions. That's where the agreement stops. How can voters wade through the health care rhetoric to pick the best offered solution? If you're uninsured, your focus is on securing adequate coverage. If you're insured, you want to know whether proposals will ding your wallet or the quality and scope of your coverage. In either case, you probably value some degree of choice. If that's a high priority, we'd recommend John McCain's plan. Barack Obama's plan extols choice, too, but over time leads in another direction. McCain's health care proposal hinges on a $5,000 tax credit for families ($2,500 for individuals) under which individuals could either keep their current insurance or go out and buy coverage, even shopping across state lines to get the best rates. And under McCain's plan, if you don't spend the entire allotted amount on coverage, the remainder can be deposited in Health Savings Accounts (which McCain wants to expand). The Obama plan, meanwhile, gives birth to a bouncing new bureaucracy: the National Health Insurance Exchange, which would offer private policies and a public insurance plan "based on benefits available to members of Congress" - generous benefits, in other words. All wanting insurance in the public plan would have to be covered under the same premium, without regard to lifestyle choices such as smoking that increase health risks. Obama's plan purports to maintain personal choice - and to some exent does at first - but a growing entitlement program will almost certainly crowd private insurers out of the market.
Article Excerpt: Click here to read entire post.
If there's one issue Coloradans have been intently listening to in the season of never-ending political debates - besides the economy, of course - it's probably health care. A new Census Bureau report, after all, reveals that nearly one in five Coloradans under age 65 lack health insurance. The number jumps to 35 percent when only counting the Hispanic community. And while that doesn't mean every one of those residents is in financial straits because of health care costs, one catastrophic medical crisis can send a family to the poorhouse. Both political parties and their candidates are quick to agree that America's health care system is fractured. Both John McCain and Barack Obama are touting preventive care and better information technology to cut costs, and have proposed safety nets (though markedly different) to cover the hard-to-insure, such as patients with pre-existing conditions. That's where the agreement stops. How can voters wade through the health care rhetoric to pick the best offered solution? If you're uninsured, your focus is on securing adequate coverage. If you're insured, you want to know whether proposals will ding your wallet or the quality and scope of your coverage. In either case, you probably value some degree of choice. If that's a high priority, we'd recommend John McCain's plan. Barack Obama's plan extols choice, too, but over time leads in another direction. McCain's health care proposal hinges on a $5,000 tax credit for families ($2,500 for individuals) under which individuals could either keep their current insurance or go out and buy coverage, even shopping across state lines to get the best rates. And under McCain's plan, if you don't spend the entire allotted amount on coverage, the remainder can be deposited in Health Savings Accounts (which McCain wants to expand). The Obama plan, meanwhile, gives birth to a bouncing new bureaucracy: the National Health Insurance Exchange, which would offer private policies and a public insurance plan "based on benefits available to members of Congress" - generous benefits, in other words. All wanting insurance in the public plan would have to be covered under the same premium, without regard to lifestyle choices such as smoking that increase health risks. Obama's plan purports to maintain personal choice - and to some exent does at first - but a growing entitlement program will almost certainly crowd private insurers out of the market.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Congressman Lewis Agrees NYC Loonie Liberals Must Be Toxic and Destructive...
...in an "apparent reaction" to destructive and embarassing uncivil behavior during a McCAIN march through NYC recently, Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia Democrat says, "My statement was a reminder to all Americans that toxic language can lead to destructive behavior," he said. "...I believe we need to return to civil discourse in this election about the pressing economic issues that are affecting our nation." See the video here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQalRPQ8stI
Let's hope Rep. Lewis can help calm down the loonie left in NYC. It is quite easy to agree that the number of raised middle fingers is indeed directly proportional to the number of Phd's in NYC.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Clinton Pardons Convicted Weathermen...
The Associated Press, Saturday, Jan. 20, 2001; 1:52 p.m. EST
A list of the people pardoned or commuted Saturday before President Clinton left office, as released by the White House:
COMMUTATIONS:
Benjamin Berger,Ronald Henderson Blackley,Bert Wayne Bolan,Gloria Libia Camargo,Charles F. Campbell,David Ronald Chandler,Lau Ching Chin, Donald R. Clark,Loreta De-Ann Coffman,Derrick Curry,Velinda Desalus,Jacob Elbaum,Linda Sue Evans,Loretta Sharon Fish,Antoinette M. Frink,David Goldstein,Gerard A.Greenfield,Jodie E.Israel,Kimberly Johnson,Billy Thornton Langston Jr.,Belinda Lynn Lumpkin,Peter MacDonald,Kellie Ann Mann,Peter Ninemire,Hugh Ricardo Padmore,Arnold Paul Prosperi,Melvin J. Reynolds,Pedro Miguel Riveiro,Dorothy Rivers,Susan Rosenberg,Kalmen Stern,Cory Stringfellow,Carlo Anibal Vignali Jr.,Thomas Wilson Waddell III,Harvey Weinig,Kim Allen Willis.
PARDONS:
Too many to list here....except his brother: Roger Clinton
Where are they now???
A list of the people pardoned or commuted Saturday before President Clinton left office, as released by the White House:
COMMUTATIONS:
Benjamin Berger,Ronald Henderson Blackley,Bert Wayne Bolan,Gloria Libia Camargo,Charles F. Campbell,David Ronald Chandler,Lau Ching Chin, Donald R. Clark,Loreta De-Ann Coffman,Derrick Curry,Velinda Desalus,Jacob Elbaum,Linda Sue Evans,Loretta Sharon Fish,Antoinette M. Frink,David Goldstein,Gerard A.Greenfield,Jodie E.Israel,Kimberly Johnson,Billy Thornton Langston Jr.,Belinda Lynn Lumpkin,Peter MacDonald,Kellie Ann Mann,Peter Ninemire,Hugh Ricardo Padmore,Arnold Paul Prosperi,Melvin J. Reynolds,Pedro Miguel Riveiro,Dorothy Rivers,Susan Rosenberg,Kalmen Stern,Cory Stringfellow,Carlo Anibal Vignali Jr.,Thomas Wilson Waddell III,Harvey Weinig,Kim Allen Willis.
PARDONS:
Too many to list here....except his brother: Roger Clinton
Where are they now???
Afterall, That's What Friends Are For...
Obama continues to tell us that when Bill Ayers was blowing up government buildings, shooting cops, and threatening the families of judges, Little Barack was only eight years old. So, that makes his ‘adult’ associations with this terrorist perfectly legitimate. Surely upon his 'initial' meeting in the Ayer living room, SOMEBODY said "Hey Barack, this is the crazy bastard that did all that bombing when you were a little kid." Or, "Mr. Obama, please meet William Ayers, he's the patriot that bombed our government."
Let me ask you a some questions:
- If my best friend’s grandfather was a Nazi SS soldier, who had gone into Poland with his small band of comrades to liquidate a town of Jews, queers and gypsies, and recently reminisced that he did not kill enough men women and Polish Jews, should I associate with him?
- If my best friend’s grandfather was one who lynched Blacks, blood on hands, down south during the 1920’s, 30’s, 40’, and 50’s, and recently recanted that he didn’t lynch enough, should I associate with him?
- If my pastor says that America is damned by God, and to watch out, for the “Chicken’s are comin’ home to roost”, should I brush it off after 20 years of head nodding and make that I was not influenced?
- If my half brother was in Kenya, homeless and broke, living in a shack — and I did nothing to help his cause, am I a bad man?
- If my country were at war, my brothers and sisters, uncles and aunts, friends and lovers were dying for country, and I was not proud enough to wear an American flag pin on my lapel, am I not a patriot?
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Leave the Pork, Take the Cannoli...
Barack Obama - over 943 days in Senate, $941M in requested earmarks
John McCAIN - over 7,500 days in Senate, $0 in requested earmarks.
After 21 years, you are still passing on the pork...thanks John.
John McCAIN - over 7,500 days in Senate, $0 in requested earmarks.
After 21 years, you are still passing on the pork...thanks John.
Friday, October 3, 2008
Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Clinton, CRA, ACORN, Freddie Mac, Do Your Homework...
Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN.
>>>SEARCH FOR THE YOUTUBE VIDEO "BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE"<<<
>>>Also available here under 'Important Election Links'<<<
>>>SEARCH FOR THE YOUTUBE VIDEO "BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE"<<<
>>>Also available here under 'Important Election Links'<<<
Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992?
Why No Burnt Hearts at Sandra's Racist Comments?
What would her mother think??
Sandra Bernhard is gross, but that's not the news. Her recent comments that led to a disenfranchisement' from a charity fundraiser would certainly hang a guy like, er, Don Imus, out to dry. He talked of "knappy haired ho's". She said that Sarah Palin would be "gang raped" by her black brothas if Palin entered Manhattan. He gets fired, she gets to swallow her words. He gets to pay lots of money to the "cause". She gets to backpeddle. He takes major heat from Jesse, Sharpton, liberal teachers, and the black community. She gets to spew her lipstick lesbian, anti-human, unfunny, disgusting racist trash all over the place. He apparently pissed off the world. She apparently is not even sorry.
From "Jeff Roe": Welcome to the real world, Bim. So Sandra, after all these years of Lib's (to include the mainstream media) not holding other Lib's accountable for their asinine comments - not to mention flat out lying - you finally get to feel what conservatives and Republicans have been dealing with for decades: actually being held accountable for opening your mouth and saying something stupid. Be an ADULT. Grow up, admit you made a mistake, do what you can to repair the damage (whether you actually feel bad about what you said or not), and move on. Oh, and I forgot the default Lib answer to all public "fax paus" - a short-term trip to rehab. Good luck with all of that.
From "Parisian-Refugee": Ms. Bernhard's comments are tantamount to a threat and not remotely funny. Threating a political candidate with violence is not only despicable, but is contrary to our democratic process. Additionally, Ms. Bernhard is clearly a racist, as she implies that the ethnicity of a rapist is relevant. Is she suggesting that being raped by "big black brothers" is somehow more or less egregious than rape by attackers of another color? She's also spineless. Rather than apologizing for her comment, she tries to deny it. I'd like to know where are the normally loud chorus of voices from NOW, NAACP, etc.
Let's gang-spit Sandra Bernhard.
Sandra Bernhard is gross, but that's not the news. Her recent comments that led to a disenfranchisement' from a charity fundraiser would certainly hang a guy like, er, Don Imus, out to dry. He talked of "knappy haired ho's". She said that Sarah Palin would be "gang raped" by her black brothas if Palin entered Manhattan. He gets fired, she gets to swallow her words. He gets to pay lots of money to the "cause". She gets to backpeddle. He takes major heat from Jesse, Sharpton, liberal teachers, and the black community. She gets to spew her lipstick lesbian, anti-human, unfunny, disgusting racist trash all over the place. He apparently pissed off the world. She apparently is not even sorry.
From "Jeff Roe": Welcome to the real world, Bim. So Sandra, after all these years of Lib's (to include the mainstream media) not holding other Lib's accountable for their asinine comments - not to mention flat out lying - you finally get to feel what conservatives and Republicans have been dealing with for decades: actually being held accountable for opening your mouth and saying something stupid. Be an ADULT. Grow up, admit you made a mistake, do what you can to repair the damage (whether you actually feel bad about what you said or not), and move on. Oh, and I forgot the default Lib answer to all public "fax paus" - a short-term trip to rehab. Good luck with all of that.
From "Parisian-Refugee": Ms. Bernhard's comments are tantamount to a threat and not remotely funny. Threating a political candidate with violence is not only despicable, but is contrary to our democratic process. Additionally, Ms. Bernhard is clearly a racist, as she implies that the ethnicity of a rapist is relevant. Is she suggesting that being raped by "big black brothers" is somehow more or less egregious than rape by attackers of another color? She's also spineless. Rather than apologizing for her comment, she tries to deny it. I'd like to know where are the normally loud chorus of voices from NOW, NAACP, etc.
Let's gang-spit Sandra Bernhard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
