Funny. I guess not so funny when you really think about it. An independent business puts up a McCAIN-PALIN sign, and the Obama Brown Shirts swing into action. Forgeddabout good debate. Forgeddabout healthy competion. Forgeddabout neighbor living peaceably next to neighbor. The Obama campaign supporters, the DemocraPs, and bullies have intimidated the business to take the sign down. 77% Democrat, and Joe the Hotelier can't put up an M-P sign. Even the NAACP was outraged?!?!?!
Shameful. Should be fun if 'they' get in the White House. Union control, centralized thought, and Brown Shirts intimidating businesses...Krystallnacht. It's no joke. Neighbor turning on neighbor.
Do your homework. Study history. It repeats itself, you know.
Read the Washington Post story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/11/AR2008101101465_pf.html
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
McCain's Med Plan Offers Consumers More Long-Term Choice...
By Editorial, Rocky Mountain News October 13, 2008
Article Excerpt: Click here to read entire post.
If there's one issue Coloradans have been intently listening to in the season of never-ending political debates - besides the economy, of course - it's probably health care. A new Census Bureau report, after all, reveals that nearly one in five Coloradans under age 65 lack health insurance. The number jumps to 35 percent when only counting the Hispanic community. And while that doesn't mean every one of those residents is in financial straits because of health care costs, one catastrophic medical crisis can send a family to the poorhouse. Both political parties and their candidates are quick to agree that America's health care system is fractured. Both John McCain and Barack Obama are touting preventive care and better information technology to cut costs, and have proposed safety nets (though markedly different) to cover the hard-to-insure, such as patients with pre-existing conditions. That's where the agreement stops. How can voters wade through the health care rhetoric to pick the best offered solution? If you're uninsured, your focus is on securing adequate coverage. If you're insured, you want to know whether proposals will ding your wallet or the quality and scope of your coverage. In either case, you probably value some degree of choice. If that's a high priority, we'd recommend John McCain's plan. Barack Obama's plan extols choice, too, but over time leads in another direction. McCain's health care proposal hinges on a $5,000 tax credit for families ($2,500 for individuals) under which individuals could either keep their current insurance or go out and buy coverage, even shopping across state lines to get the best rates. And under McCain's plan, if you don't spend the entire allotted amount on coverage, the remainder can be deposited in Health Savings Accounts (which McCain wants to expand). The Obama plan, meanwhile, gives birth to a bouncing new bureaucracy: the National Health Insurance Exchange, which would offer private policies and a public insurance plan "based on benefits available to members of Congress" - generous benefits, in other words. All wanting insurance in the public plan would have to be covered under the same premium, without regard to lifestyle choices such as smoking that increase health risks. Obama's plan purports to maintain personal choice - and to some exent does at first - but a growing entitlement program will almost certainly crowd private insurers out of the market.
Article Excerpt: Click here to read entire post.
If there's one issue Coloradans have been intently listening to in the season of never-ending political debates - besides the economy, of course - it's probably health care. A new Census Bureau report, after all, reveals that nearly one in five Coloradans under age 65 lack health insurance. The number jumps to 35 percent when only counting the Hispanic community. And while that doesn't mean every one of those residents is in financial straits because of health care costs, one catastrophic medical crisis can send a family to the poorhouse. Both political parties and their candidates are quick to agree that America's health care system is fractured. Both John McCain and Barack Obama are touting preventive care and better information technology to cut costs, and have proposed safety nets (though markedly different) to cover the hard-to-insure, such as patients with pre-existing conditions. That's where the agreement stops. How can voters wade through the health care rhetoric to pick the best offered solution? If you're uninsured, your focus is on securing adequate coverage. If you're insured, you want to know whether proposals will ding your wallet or the quality and scope of your coverage. In either case, you probably value some degree of choice. If that's a high priority, we'd recommend John McCain's plan. Barack Obama's plan extols choice, too, but over time leads in another direction. McCain's health care proposal hinges on a $5,000 tax credit for families ($2,500 for individuals) under which individuals could either keep their current insurance or go out and buy coverage, even shopping across state lines to get the best rates. And under McCain's plan, if you don't spend the entire allotted amount on coverage, the remainder can be deposited in Health Savings Accounts (which McCain wants to expand). The Obama plan, meanwhile, gives birth to a bouncing new bureaucracy: the National Health Insurance Exchange, which would offer private policies and a public insurance plan "based on benefits available to members of Congress" - generous benefits, in other words. All wanting insurance in the public plan would have to be covered under the same premium, without regard to lifestyle choices such as smoking that increase health risks. Obama's plan purports to maintain personal choice - and to some exent does at first - but a growing entitlement program will almost certainly crowd private insurers out of the market.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Clinton Pardons Convicted Weathermen...
The Associated Press, Saturday, Jan. 20, 2001; 1:52 p.m. EST
A list of the people pardoned or commuted Saturday before President Clinton left office, as released by the White House:
COMMUTATIONS:
Benjamin Berger,Ronald Henderson Blackley,Bert Wayne Bolan,Gloria Libia Camargo,Charles F. Campbell,David Ronald Chandler,Lau Ching Chin, Donald R. Clark,Loreta De-Ann Coffman,Derrick Curry,Velinda Desalus,Jacob Elbaum,Linda Sue Evans,Loretta Sharon Fish,Antoinette M. Frink,David Goldstein,Gerard A.Greenfield,Jodie E.Israel,Kimberly Johnson,Billy Thornton Langston Jr.,Belinda Lynn Lumpkin,Peter MacDonald,Kellie Ann Mann,Peter Ninemire,Hugh Ricardo Padmore,Arnold Paul Prosperi,Melvin J. Reynolds,Pedro Miguel Riveiro,Dorothy Rivers,Susan Rosenberg,Kalmen Stern,Cory Stringfellow,Carlo Anibal Vignali Jr.,Thomas Wilson Waddell III,Harvey Weinig,Kim Allen Willis.
PARDONS:
Too many to list here....except his brother: Roger Clinton
Where are they now???
A list of the people pardoned or commuted Saturday before President Clinton left office, as released by the White House:
COMMUTATIONS:
Benjamin Berger,Ronald Henderson Blackley,Bert Wayne Bolan,Gloria Libia Camargo,Charles F. Campbell,David Ronald Chandler,Lau Ching Chin, Donald R. Clark,Loreta De-Ann Coffman,Derrick Curry,Velinda Desalus,Jacob Elbaum,Linda Sue Evans,Loretta Sharon Fish,Antoinette M. Frink,David Goldstein,Gerard A.Greenfield,Jodie E.Israel,Kimberly Johnson,Billy Thornton Langston Jr.,Belinda Lynn Lumpkin,Peter MacDonald,Kellie Ann Mann,Peter Ninemire,Hugh Ricardo Padmore,Arnold Paul Prosperi,Melvin J. Reynolds,Pedro Miguel Riveiro,Dorothy Rivers,Susan Rosenberg,Kalmen Stern,Cory Stringfellow,Carlo Anibal Vignali Jr.,Thomas Wilson Waddell III,Harvey Weinig,Kim Allen Willis.
PARDONS:
Too many to list here....except his brother: Roger Clinton
Where are they now???
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Leave the Pork, Take the Cannoli...
Barack Obama - over 943 days in Senate, $941M in requested earmarks
John McCAIN - over 7,500 days in Senate, $0 in requested earmarks.
After 21 years, you are still passing on the pork...thanks John.
John McCAIN - over 7,500 days in Senate, $0 in requested earmarks.
After 21 years, you are still passing on the pork...thanks John.
Friday, October 3, 2008
Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Clinton, CRA, ACORN, Freddie Mac, Do Your Homework...
Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN.
>>>SEARCH FOR THE YOUTUBE VIDEO "BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE"<<<
>>>Also available here under 'Important Election Links'<<<
>>>SEARCH FOR THE YOUTUBE VIDEO "BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE"<<<
>>>Also available here under 'Important Election Links'<<<
Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992? Obama, Corruption, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), ACORN. Who was President in 1992?
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Monday, September 22, 2008
Desperate Dems Denounce Diversity While Claiming Racism...
I would indeed vote for a black man, and for that matter, a black woman. I would vote for Colin Powell, and for that matter Condeleeza Rice.
But I would not vote for Obama. No way, no how. There. Does that make ME a racist? The dems are making the case that a NOBAMA vote is a racist vote. Screw You! I am just an informed citizen, knowledgable voter, and proud American....certainly no racist, as evidenced by the fact that I would indeed vote for the right person of color. The fact that Obama is not the 'right' person for me is my God Damned choice....screw you.
BHO is ill conceived excuse for the champion of race relations. He has lied, intimidated, and bullshitted his way through a hopeful American democracy, with the help of a pathetically desperate democrat party, wishing to dispel America's so-called chains of racism by utilizing that very tactic. Obama has skated his way through Harvard the same way...crappy grades and he still becomes the first black editor of the Harvard Law Review! Utter racism.... He is simply full of hot air. A man of no substance, little character, and even less experience. Wake up America! Wake Up!!!
But I would not vote for Obama. No way, no how. There. Does that make ME a racist? The dems are making the case that a NOBAMA vote is a racist vote. Screw You! I am just an informed citizen, knowledgable voter, and proud American....certainly no racist, as evidenced by the fact that I would indeed vote for the right person of color. The fact that Obama is not the 'right' person for me is my God Damned choice....screw you.
BHO is ill conceived excuse for the champion of race relations. He has lied, intimidated, and bullshitted his way through a hopeful American democracy, with the help of a pathetically desperate democrat party, wishing to dispel America's so-called chains of racism by utilizing that very tactic. Obama has skated his way through Harvard the same way...crappy grades and he still becomes the first black editor of the Harvard Law Review! Utter racism.... He is simply full of hot air. A man of no substance, little character, and even less experience. Wake up America! Wake Up!!!
Monday, September 15, 2008
Uncommon Sense from Guest Editor George Lake...
It’s been a pretty wild couple weeks in politics! Obama gave a good speech at the Democratic convention and got his bounce but I’d have to describe it as pretty standard democratic/populous content describing what government is going to give us, or do for us. Where was the “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country” that another famous Democrat once stated in an inauguration speech??
Followed right behind this speech was the announcement of Sarah Palin to the McCain ticket. At first the generic and reasonable (as I have to add myself to this group and who cannot describe me as anything but reasonable!!) reaction was “who is this unknown” and is she going to be an embarrassment?? Everyone was initially questioning this choice (and whether McCain had lost his mind!),but she carried herself beautifully in her introductory speech.
Because of the way she handled herself in the initial spotlight and her fine address, I was perfectly willing to wait and get more input on her background, accomplishments, and positions before I made a decision about her. I can’t say our mainstream media has taken the same position. She has been pilloried and even slandered by supposedly mainstream media for the whole week before her nomination speech. I truly feel that large portions of our media were bent on destroying her. (Case in point is the NY Times- after not even commenting on John Edward’s affair until it was well known, published 3 articles on their FRONT page on Sarah Palin mostly using the fact that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant to question McCain’s choice and her ability to be VP). Also, quickly discussed in the mainstream media was some crazy blogger’s assertion that Sarah was not the one that had Trig (the baby with Down’s Syndrome) but it was in fact her 17 yr old daughter’s baby!!!
By the time the Governor gave her speech at the RNC, people could have been forgiven if they were watching just to see a total simpleton come on stage and completely embarrass herself. But the results could not have been more polar opposite. What we saw was an extremely competent PERSON who has a track record of reform in Alaska that covers both ethics and budgetary matters. I will readily admit she has little in the way of foreign affairs experience BUT she is being considered for the VP slot NOT the President! Obama also has a complete scarcity of foreign policy experience and he indirectly acknowledged this by picking Biden as his running mate. People can like Obama as a man but it must be acknowledged that he has very little in the way of any accomplishments or public background that would qualify him for President, at least by historical standards.
I know there are quite a few that are tired of Bush and can’t stand some of his positions especially in the way he has prosecuted the war on terrorism. This would lead people to vote for anybody but Bush. I ask that you reflect on your upcoming decision and consider how McCain has had some very public disagreements with Bush on some of these matters. McCain came out publicly against “torture” and what Bush was doing or had done. He also is for closing “Gitmo”. Now I’m not sure I agree with either of these positions by McCain, but it does show he makes his own decisions and would not simply be another Bush. The Democrats are trying to make McCain synonymous to Bush but this defies almost a decade of reports of McCain liking the “maverick” label and “even enjoying putting a finger in the Republican’s eye”.
McCain also took a very public stand on the “surge” back in the darkest days when it looked like the Iraqi war was getting away from us. He pushed to make it happen. Both Obama and Biden were adamantly against the surge which by this time had become the popular choice. Their solution was to simply put together a timeline to get the troops out. This would have been catastrophic to America’s national interest and to world stability.
McCain pushed for the surge and the results have been “more than anyone could have hoped for” as Obama recently admitted and stated on the O’Reilly factor while at the same time adamantly refusing to admit that NOT backing the surge was a mistake by him.
I am confident McCain can bring about the “change” from Bush that people want while at the same time having the experience and record WE NEED on foreign affairs in these dangerous times. I hope everyone can consider this as they form their decisions on the next President.
Followed right behind this speech was the announcement of Sarah Palin to the McCain ticket. At first the generic and reasonable (as I have to add myself to this group and who cannot describe me as anything but reasonable!!) reaction was “who is this unknown” and is she going to be an embarrassment?? Everyone was initially questioning this choice (and whether McCain had lost his mind!),but she carried herself beautifully in her introductory speech.
Because of the way she handled herself in the initial spotlight and her fine address, I was perfectly willing to wait and get more input on her background, accomplishments, and positions before I made a decision about her. I can’t say our mainstream media has taken the same position. She has been pilloried and even slandered by supposedly mainstream media for the whole week before her nomination speech. I truly feel that large portions of our media were bent on destroying her. (Case in point is the NY Times- after not even commenting on John Edward’s affair until it was well known, published 3 articles on their FRONT page on Sarah Palin mostly using the fact that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant to question McCain’s choice and her ability to be VP). Also, quickly discussed in the mainstream media was some crazy blogger’s assertion that Sarah was not the one that had Trig (the baby with Down’s Syndrome) but it was in fact her 17 yr old daughter’s baby!!!
By the time the Governor gave her speech at the RNC, people could have been forgiven if they were watching just to see a total simpleton come on stage and completely embarrass herself. But the results could not have been more polar opposite. What we saw was an extremely competent PERSON who has a track record of reform in Alaska that covers both ethics and budgetary matters. I will readily admit she has little in the way of foreign affairs experience BUT she is being considered for the VP slot NOT the President! Obama also has a complete scarcity of foreign policy experience and he indirectly acknowledged this by picking Biden as his running mate. People can like Obama as a man but it must be acknowledged that he has very little in the way of any accomplishments or public background that would qualify him for President, at least by historical standards.
I know there are quite a few that are tired of Bush and can’t stand some of his positions especially in the way he has prosecuted the war on terrorism. This would lead people to vote for anybody but Bush. I ask that you reflect on your upcoming decision and consider how McCain has had some very public disagreements with Bush on some of these matters. McCain came out publicly against “torture” and what Bush was doing or had done. He also is for closing “Gitmo”. Now I’m not sure I agree with either of these positions by McCain, but it does show he makes his own decisions and would not simply be another Bush. The Democrats are trying to make McCain synonymous to Bush but this defies almost a decade of reports of McCain liking the “maverick” label and “even enjoying putting a finger in the Republican’s eye”.
McCain also took a very public stand on the “surge” back in the darkest days when it looked like the Iraqi war was getting away from us. He pushed to make it happen. Both Obama and Biden were adamantly against the surge which by this time had become the popular choice. Their solution was to simply put together a timeline to get the troops out. This would have been catastrophic to America’s national interest and to world stability.
McCain pushed for the surge and the results have been “more than anyone could have hoped for” as Obama recently admitted and stated on the O’Reilly factor while at the same time adamantly refusing to admit that NOT backing the surge was a mistake by him.
I am confident McCain can bring about the “change” from Bush that people want while at the same time having the experience and record WE NEED on foreign affairs in these dangerous times. I hope everyone can consider this as they form their decisions on the next President.
Friday, September 5, 2008
It Ain't Supposed to be This Way....
BHO is under the gun....and the press is turning. Simply look at the images now appearing in the press. No longer are the Savior's eyes gazing towards the hopeful heavens, but now have been humbled and are forced downward. No longer are his arms outstretched in an worldwide embrace of the dis-enfranchised...but now simply grasp a napkin to wipe his brow.
McCAIN/Palin have driven a stake through the heart of the Great Savior...Now, BHO actually has to work at it...and stumble, and fumble, and pretend he is still the chosen one. Game On!
Thursday, August 21, 2008
I say again, Emperor Obama Has No Close (3/4/08 post)...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a sharp turnaround, Republican John McCain has opened a 5-point lead on Democrat Barack Obama in the U.S. presidential race and is seen as a stronger manager of the economy, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Wednesday.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Obama Wants to Change Greatest Nation on Earth...
"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it."
- Barack Hussein Obama
- Barack Hussein Obama
Friday, August 1, 2008
Hollywood Heaps Hypocritical Hoopla Upon Hussein
It seems that Hollywood is more upset about the latest McCAIN ad depicting a few seconds of Spears, Hilton and BHO as Hollywood hype.
Where is the outrage for the Ludacris' song/video otherwise that's hit the airwaves?
lu·di·crous
/ˈludɪkrəs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[loo-di-kruhs] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
causing laughter because of absurdity; provoking or deserving derision; ridiculous; laughable: a ludicrous lack of efficiency.
Friday, July 4, 2008
It Depends What the Definition of "Win" Is...
July 3rd, 2008. On the news last night, I believe CNN,there was an Obama surrogate talking about BHO's flip flop on the war...about his campaign promise to be out of Iraq in 16 months. Obama made his statement, then had another new conference and 'c-l-a-r-i-f-i-e-d his statement to be that when elected Command in Chief, he will remove 'combat troops' (please read carefully) from Iraq...but what troops will be leave behind? What will the cost be of those 'left behind'?
This guy actually said, and I quote, "It depends on what the definition of "Win" is!" I am not kidding....now who does that sound like? Remember the famous "it depends on what the definition of 'IS' is"...our illustrious impeached president, William Jefferson Clinton! I could not believe my ears...
Deja Vu, all over again.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
SENATOR OBAMA'S FANTASY PLAN FOR MAKING US SAFER...
For Immediate Release
Contact: Press Office
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
703-650-5550
ARLINGTON, VA -- U.S. Senator John McCain's presidential campaign today released the following statement by Senior Advisor Mark Salter on Senator Barack Obama's Iraq speech today:
"Senator Obama says that ending the war will not be easy, that 'there will be dangers involved.' Yet, in that patented way of his, he declines to name those dangers. Let me enumerate a few: al Qaeda, which is now on the run, will survive, claim victory and continue to provoke sectarian tensions that, while they have been subdued by the 'tactics' of the surge, still exist and are ripe for provocation by al Qaeda, which would almost certainly ignite again civil war in Iraq, a civil war that could easily descend into genocide. To say that invading Iraq was used as a recruiting tool for al Qaeda is one thing. To pretend that our defeat there won't provide an even bigger one is foolish supposition. Iran, which trains Shia extremists and is known to arm and equip Sunni extremists, a fact Senator Obama is apparently unaware of, will also view our premature withdrawal as a victory, as will other countries in the region, and the biggest state supporter of terrorists, a country with nuclear ambitions and a stated desire to destroy the State of Israel, will see its influence in the Middle East grow significantly. These are some of 'dangers,' that our premature withdrawal from Iraq will engender, and they all have the potential to destabilize the entire region. A realistic plan to prevent them from occurring is what people with experience in statecraft call 'strategy,' something Senator Obama has not offered yet.
"Senator Obama, as has also become a habit of his 'new politics,' mischaracterizes John McCain's position by saying McCain did not want to reduce troops because the violence in Iraq was too high, and now do not wish to do so because the violence in down. The reason violence is down is because General Petraeus' counterinsurgency is, which even Senator Obama recognizes, succeeding. Those 'tactics,' are advancing our 'strategy.' Deprive General Petraeus of the resources and manpower to employ those tactics, or worse, leave Iraq altogether, and our strategy will collapse. That is national security 101. John McCain wants American forces to come home when our clear and serious interests at stake in Iraq, which nearly 4,000 Americans have given their lives to secure, are truly safe, when al Qaeda is defeated; Iran's influence is contained, and the potential for a truly cataclysmic civil war in Iraq is remote. That, I think, is what is called 'making us safer.' Senator Obama's plan, if it can be charitably described as one, would do the reverse."
Monday, March 17, 2008
** Newflash ** Michelle Obama Desires to Support McCain...
She said it herself, at a rally in Villa Nova, PA. She preached the Obama Gospel my friends....passionately, and at great length. "By any measure", she said, "Barak is BRILLIANT!" And this terrible country NEEDS him! And we are all fools....and stupid, and unable to think for ourselves.....but then, in an epiphany laden with soulful sorrow and tactical terrorism, lo and behold....she has seen the light, and finally said something of Princeton and Harvard learned intelligence....
She said point blank, and I quote: "...that the country needs a leader with Character, Leadership and Choice."
Can I get a Amen, friends? ......AMEN!
Can I get a Hallelujah, my people? ......Hallelujah!
Now where can we find a candidate with Character, Leadership and Choice?
Character, Leadership, and Choice....ahh, I thought she'd never ask...Vote McCAIN.
She said point blank, and I quote: "...that the country needs a leader with Character, Leadership and Choice."
Can I get a Amen, friends? ......AMEN!
Can I get a Hallelujah, my people? ......Hallelujah!
Now where can we find a candidate with Character, Leadership and Choice?
Character, Leadership, and Choice....ahh, I thought she'd never ask...Vote McCAIN.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Emperor Obama Has No Close...
Finally, the country is getting a taste of the real Obama...he is now getting testy with reporters asking the tough(?) questions. He is getting caught in lies and sticky situations--like the NAFTA chit chat with Canada; like the support from Louis Farrakan; like the Christian Church he has belonged to for the last 20 years.
If you get past the oratory, the teerful crowds in search of "hope" and those looking for the magic CHANGE pill, you will see that there is nothing there. It's all feel good fluff. Passionate, yes. Inspirational, yes. But a lousy way to pick a COMMANDER IN CHIEF!
During a sales call, the salesperson orates about a product and how it will solve the problems at hand. The benefits of the product shine through the myriad of colorful brochures strewn about the table. But, when the prospect asks for a demonstration of the product's superior capabilities, the salesperson falls short. He can't prove what is said in the brochures, and cannot close the deal...
The soon to be crowned Democrat emperor has no CLOSE!
If you get past the oratory, the teerful crowds in search of "hope" and those looking for the magic CHANGE pill, you will see that there is nothing there. It's all feel good fluff. Passionate, yes. Inspirational, yes. But a lousy way to pick a COMMANDER IN CHIEF!
During a sales call, the salesperson orates about a product and how it will solve the problems at hand. The benefits of the product shine through the myriad of colorful brochures strewn about the table. But, when the prospect asks for a demonstration of the product's superior capabilities, the salesperson falls short. He can't prove what is said in the brochures, and cannot close the deal...
The soon to be crowned Democrat emperor has no CLOSE!
Three Questions for Obama, Clinton, and McCain...
Here are a few questions an American CITIZEN should consider when selecting the next President of these United States...
1) Will you wear an American Flag pin?
2) As Commander in Chief, will you salute the military in your entrourage, and the troops across the land protecting our interests?
3) Will you pledge allegience to the Flag of the United States of America?
--> Clinton has already failed #2, as documented in "Deriliction of Duty".
--> Obama has already failed #1, as documented on video.
--> As for John McCAIN, his patriotism and sacrifice are unquestionable.
--> If any candidate fails this simple test, all other tests are meaningless.
1) Will you wear an American Flag pin?
2) As Commander in Chief, will you salute the military in your entrourage, and the troops across the land protecting our interests?
3) Will you pledge allegience to the Flag of the United States of America?
--> Clinton has already failed #2, as documented in "Deriliction of Duty".
--> Obama has already failed #1, as documented on video.
--> As for John McCAIN, his patriotism and sacrifice are unquestionable.
--> If any candidate fails this simple test, all other tests are meaningless.
Monday, January 7, 2008
Obam~Obama~Rama! Global warming, nuclear style...
Some friends of mine are voting for Barack Hussein Obama. Good for them...but it puzzles me. I mean Barack is certainly passionate, exciting, hopeful, handsome, articulate, and inspirational. He is also inexperienced, young, inexperienced, and, uh, way too young to run my country. During the neighborhood Christmas parties, folks were professing their love and support for Obama. I can't figure it out.
The feel good, hope stuff is nice to think about, but I do not need the government to give me hope; I do not need the President to make me feel good, and I do not have the need Barack to tell me how to be a good father~~my Dad taught me that.
Keep me safe, get me oil, pickup my trash and fix my potholes.
Maybe some folks feel that standing for Obama equates to stamping out racism. A feel good vote that shows that this citizen is above the others. I'm not buying it.
Black, red, yellow, or white; Jew, Gentile, Catholic or Morman --it does not matter to me. Character and experience matters. I think Barack is too inexperienced to lead this country, especially in these trying times. The Edwards/Clinton/Obama crap of: two Americas, uninsured children, global warming, gay marriage, big oil, no oil, imported oil, high taxes, change, real change, end the war, pull the troops, blah, blah, blah...is just icing on the cake, as far as I am concerned. Security, terrorism, porous borders, Iran, Iraq, China, Pakistan and their nukes are situations that if not handled precisely from a position of strength, will make all other points moot. Global warming, nuclear style.
The feel good, hope stuff is nice to think about, but I do not need the government to give me hope; I do not need the President to make me feel good, and I do not have the need Barack to tell me how to be a good father~~my Dad taught me that.
Keep me safe, get me oil, pickup my trash and fix my potholes.
Maybe some folks feel that standing for Obama equates to stamping out racism. A feel good vote that shows that this citizen is above the others. I'm not buying it.
Black, red, yellow, or white; Jew, Gentile, Catholic or Morman --it does not matter to me. Character and experience matters. I think Barack is too inexperienced to lead this country, especially in these trying times. The Edwards/Clinton/Obama crap of: two Americas, uninsured children, global warming, gay marriage, big oil, no oil, imported oil, high taxes, change, real change, end the war, pull the troops, blah, blah, blah...is just icing on the cake, as far as I am concerned. Security, terrorism, porous borders, Iran, Iraq, China, Pakistan and their nukes are situations that if not handled precisely from a position of strength, will make all other points moot. Global warming, nuclear style.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
